Sunday, January 29, 2023
  • Login
The Pro Garden
  • Home
  • Home Decoration
  • Architecture
  • Gardening
  • DIY
  • Home Insurance
  • Innovation
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Home Decoration
  • Architecture
  • Gardening
  • DIY
  • Home Insurance
  • Innovation
No Result
View All Result
The Pro Garden
No Result
View All Result
Home Architecture

Are the widespread types of “classical” Greco-Roman masonry structure simply stylistic conventions carried over from earlier wooden constructions? : structure

The Pro Garden by The Pro Garden
September 7, 2021
in Architecture
0
Are the widespread types of “classical” Greco-Roman masonry structure simply stylistic conventions carried over from earlier wooden constructions? : structure
0
SHARES
46
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Email


I’ve had this quote from The Fountainhead at the back of my thoughts for fairly a while:

“Look,” stated Roark. “The well-known flutings on the well-known columns–what are they there for? To cover the joints in wooden – when columns had been manufactured from wooden, solely these aren’t, they’re marble. The triglyphs, what are they? Wooden. Picket beams, the way in which they needed to be laid when individuals started to construct picket shacks. Your Greeks took marble they usually made copies of their picket constructions out of it, as a result of others had accomplished it that approach. Then your masters of the Renaissance got here alongside and made copies in plaster of copies in marble of copies in wooden.

is any reality to this, that the varieties we see in “classical” Greco-Roman structure – within the well-known marble/limestone buildings – is de facto only a derivation from the extra archaic wooden constructions (that are nearly solely absent from our trendy consciousness as a result of they clearly didn’t survive) and it was solely in these wooden constructions that every one of those architectural tropes had been really structurally essential/practical, and by the point they turned masonary they had been simply copied due to stylistic conference (like this)?

And, in that case, is there any good archaeological/historic proof or sources that may make clear this course of?

(edit: hyperlink mounted)



Source link

Tags: ArchitecturecarriedclassicalCommonconventionsearlierformsGrecoRomanmasonrystructuresstylisticwood
Previous Post

OMA expands the Wilshire Boulevard Temple with its first Los Angeles venture

Next Post

California Supreme Courtroom guidelines life insurance coverage stoppage requires correct discover

Next Post
California Supreme Courtroom guidelines life insurance coverage stoppage requires correct discover

California Supreme Courtroom guidelines life insurance coverage stoppage requires correct discover

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
THE PRO GARDEN

Copyright © 2021 The Pro Garden.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Home Decoration
  • Architecture
  • Gardening
  • DIY
  • Home Insurance
  • Innovation

Copyright © 2021 The Pro Garden.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In